Fantastic new ideas, market research, user feedback – you have everything to create the perfect products. But how do you decide which tasks or ideas to tackle first?
Whatever choice you make, you must justify it to shareholders and your team. And what's better than a prioritization score to do this?
In this highly competitive world, where every task and idea competes for attention and resources, mastering the art of prioritization is crucial. Using a framework like RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort) prioritization can help you quantify your ideas and provide a basis for selecting a specific idea over others.
This article will discuss the details of the RICE scoring model and how it can transform your decision-making.
What is RICE prioritization?
The RICE model is a prioritization framework used in product management and project development to evaluate and prioritize tasks, resources, or projects by scoring them based on four criteria.
RICE means:
- R – Reach: Reach measures the number of users or stakeholders that will be affected by a given task or feature
- I – Impact: Impact evaluates the potential positive effect that a task or feature can have on the product, users or business goals
- C – Confidence: Confidence represents the level of certainty or confidence that the team has in its estimates of impact and effort for a given task or resource
- E – Effort: Effort measures the resources, including time, workforce, and budget, required to complete a task or implement a feature
The RICE method helps provide structure and objectivity during decision making, facilitating better management of priorities and objective decisions.
The formula for the RICE method is as follows:
RICE Score = (Reach x Impact x Trust) / Effort
With this score it becomes easier to decide the project order and priority tasks.
The origin of the RICE scoring model
Sean McBride, former product manager at Intercom, co-developed the RICE framework. He and his colleagues struggled to find a prioritization framework that best met their decision-making needs.
One of the common problems product managers face is selecting projects based on personal perspectives or those with a broader scope. Thus, McBride developed the RICE score to solve problems related to objective decision making.
How does RICE prioritization work?
Previously, we briefly discussed the components of the RICE score. In this section, we will delve into them one by one.
Reach
The first component of the RICE framework is Reach. Measures the number of people a project affects in a given period. The greater the reach, the greater the number of people the project will benefit. It is typically measured over the course of a month or quarter.
To calculate reach, you can define which category of users you are considering. However, it is better to use real measurements of product metrics.
For example, suppose you're launching a new collaboration feature on your measurement platform, with 100,000 monthly active users.
The first step is to identify the potential audience or user base that this feature will impact over the course of a month (or quarter). Let's say you estimate this feature to be relevant to 40% of your user base. So your reach is 40,000 users.
Impact
Impact evaluates the potential effect of a task, resource, or project on individual users. In reach, you measure the number of people impacted by a resource. In impact, you measure how much people are affected.
So, in the above example, you can see how much the collaboration feature will increase user engagement and team collaboration.
We usually measure impact with a larger objective. McBride used a multiple-choice scale for this:
- 3 = Massive impact
- 2 = High impact
- 1 = Medium impact
- 0.5 = Low impact
- 0.25 = Minimal impact
You don't need to use the same scale. You can choose the one that suits your needs.
A crucial point to remember when measuring this is that you need to set clear goals for each project before using the RICE score. And the best way to do this is by collaborating with your team and stakeholders. You can use a shared whiteboard to brainstorm ideas and communicate in real time.

Trust
Confidence measures your certainty about your estimates of reach, impact, and effort. This criteria is determined based on the answer to the following question:
How confident are you regarding this feature and the scores given?
The answer is expressed as a simple percentage. McBride used the following multiple-choice scale:
- 100% = High confidence
- 80% = medium confidence
- 50% = Low confidence
Anything below 50% is a guess. Again, you can use whatever scale works best for you. From 10% intervals to 25% intervals, use what best suits your needs. However, the key here is to be completely honest.
User context, research, and experimentation must support a high trust score. You can also use product backlog management tools for advanced analytics and insights.
Confidence scoring allows you to ensure that your decisions are truly data-driven. If you have high reach and impact scores but a low trust score, you can explore how to improve.
Effort
Effort tells you the total amount of work you need to do to complete the project. You must consider the time of your team members, including product, design, and engineering teams. It is estimated in person-months, the amount of work a team member can accomplish in a month.
Unlike other factors, effort is a negative factor. Therefore, the greater the effort, the less viable your project will be. Greater effort means you need more time to finish the project.
For example, designing, testing, debugging, and releasing the feature in our example could take three months. Assuming you have a team of 5 people, your effort score would be 15 person-months.
Talking to your team members is best to get an accurate picture.
How to optimize the RICE prioritization process
Using product management templates and software can streamline your RICE prioritization process.
ClickUp is a project management tool that simplifies product management and makes it faster and easier. You can use ClickUp for Product Management to map your product vision, simplify prioritization, and build roadmaps that connect teamwork.
Also, read about work prioritization tools to help you better prioritize your daily work.
See how:
ClickUp Task View

Task views offer a unique way to visualize your tasks. You can select from views including list, activity, board, table, and team. You can list tasks, write updates, ask contextual questions about different tasks, and generate task summaries.
Ask members about their specific tasks to estimate your team's effort (face-to-face hours/weeks/months).
Custom fields

With custom fields, you can customize your workspace and add different types of data. You can use advanced formulas, math functions, date and time functions, etc. This is perfect for adding scores to your RICE components.
ClickUp also allows you to create fields, edit them and show and hide them when necessary.
ClickUp Gantt Charts

You can use ClickUp Product Planning to build roadmaps, set milestones, add templates, better visualize, and more. Gantt charts allow you to plan success and visualize project timelines. You can easily compare and collaborate, manage priorities, and track progress.
Click goals

The RICE prioritization framework works best when your team and stakeholders agree on the goals you want to achieve using different ideas. ClickUp Goals helps you align team goals, set clear goals, measure success, and manage all your goals in one place.
Prioritization models
Using product prioritization and planning models increases efficiency, improves decision making, and ensures effective resource allocation. Some models you can use are:
- Evaluate tasks based on their impact and effort levels using the ClickUp prioritization matrix template

- Manage ideas and proposals using the colorful prioritization whiteboard template

- Describe your development process and track timelines using the new product development model. This model also helps align teams against milestones

- Visualize your product development process and get detailed insights into each component using the product roadmap template

Pros and Cons of Using the RICE Prioritization Method
Like other frameworks, the RICE prioritization method has advantages and flaws. While it quantifies your ideas, it can also be inaccurate. Let's understand these pros and cons in detail.
Pros
Here are some of the pros of RICE prioritization:
1. Better communication
It enables better communication using a standardized scoring system and helps communicate priorities directly. It helps everyone identify high-priority tasks and better manage their priorities. Additionally, using product management tools also improves collaboration and sharing of real-time updates.
2. Clear prioritization
The RICE score provides a clear, numerical prioritization of tasks or resources. This way, you can sort the list by priority, focusing more on high priority items. This allows you to use your resources, including time and money, efficiently.
3. Easy to understand
RICE uses a simple scoring system based on four factors so people can use it without certification or product management qualifications. Team members, stakeholders, and decision makers can easily use it to understand the reasoning behind various prioritization-related decisions.
4. Considers significant factors
The score prioritizes four main factors: reach, impact, trust and effort. These are among the most crucial factors in evaluating the viability of an idea and whether an idea is viable.
5. Data-driven prioritization
The RICE framework offers a quantitative approach to prioritization, eliminating personal biases and subjective opinions. It relies on measurable, data-driven facts that help you make informed decisions.
6. Categorical flexibility
It offers flexibility by allowing teams to adapt and apply it to different categories of tasks, products, and resources. Whether it's new product features, bug fixes or process improvements, RICE can be adapted to suit different contexts.
7. Helps with alignment
The RICE score helps align team members and stakeholders and ensures everyone is working toward the same goals. This also promotes a collaborative and more focused work environment.
Cons
Some of its cons include:
1. May be inaccurate
One of the main disadvantages of RICE is that it involves a lot of estimates and assumptions. We may overestimate the values, which will make the score inaccurate. Furthermore, the trust factor is subjective based on the person's understanding and confidence in the task.
Therefore, it is crucial to be as accurate as possible. The necessary metrics can help you do this.
2. Less customer-centric
Another problem with this method is that it is not customer-centric. Factors like reach and impact capture some aspects of customers. However, crucial elements such as preferences, feedback and emotional aspects are not considered.
Even with reach and impact, these numbers are defined by what the product manager believes the reach and influence of a given product would be over a given time.
3. Easily manipulated
The assignment of RICE scores is not entirely free from subjective judgment. Different product managers have different biases that can lead to inconsistent scores. Some may intentionally increase or decrease scores, especially on the trust component. One way to avoid this is to involve several people in the scoring process.
Variations and alternatives to RICE
Here are some of the alternatives to the RICE prioritization model:
BRICE
BRICE Scoring is an excellent alternative to the RICE framework for prioritizing product management. It is similar to RICE, except it measures an additional factor called Business Importance.
Therefore, the five factors measured are Business Importance, Reach, Impact, Trust and Effort. Business Importance measures how the product you are considering aligns with the strategic goals of the business. It is normally scored between 1 and 3, with 3 being the highest score (representing that the product is fundamental to the business).
To calculate the BRICE score, you can use this formula:
BRICE Score = (Business Importance x Reach x Impact x Trust) / Effort
Value vs. Effort
Value vs. Effort is a prioritization method that focuses on value and effort and allows you to evaluate different resources. The idea is very simple: you measure the benefit that the idea will bring you and compare it with the effort required to achieve it.
Give each resource a value score and an effort score to calculate it. High-value, low-effort features are clear winners. High value, high effort and low value, low effort come next. It's best to avoid low-value, high-effort resources.
Although the method gives a clear idea of prioritization, one of its disadvantages is that it is difficult to estimate the value and effort.
SU-RICE
The SU-RICE framework has two imperative factors not included in the RICE model: source and User Persona. This is a more comprehensive framework, as it also considers which source you are getting ideas from for product features and user personality, as well as reach, impact, trust, and effort.
You can consider four sources: prospect, customer, market or competition, and internal, and list them according to priority. This framework provides a more detailed understanding of the context and potential impact of a task or resource.
Story Mapping
Story mapping prioritizes features based on how your customers plan to use the product. It is not a scoring model. Instead, it involves collecting user stories that describe a feature and mapping them.
This provides an outline of the product and lists subtasks and details for each task. This method is highly customer-centric and allows you to see the bigger picture. When you ideate, you also create a visual document that reminds everyone of your goals.
Prioritize better using the RICE Framework with ClickUp
The RICE framework is an excellent method for deciding which ideas deserve attention first. It quantifies ideas and makes it easier to prioritize them. Furthermore, it takes little time to use and helps in making objective decisions.
A few things to remember when using the template:
- Focus on a goal
- Your scoring system affects the score
- Involve your team during the scoring process to make it more objective
- Use product management templates for better visualization
- Regularly reassess and update scores
- It may undervalue technical debt, so consider it separately in your prioritization system
A complete product management tool like ClickUp offers better alignment, collaboration, visualization, and templates during prioritization.
LATEST VIDEOS
Find out which license is best for you and your team
Take the opportunity to check out other content on ClickUp
ClickUp, what can you expect from this tool?
Project management tools: After all, why are they so important? Understand why you too [...]
Apr
The 10 best mind mapping software for mapping projects in 2024
A brilliant idea pops into your head, but you don't know how to bring it to life [...]
Mar
10 free AI text generators to write in 2023
Writer's block can happen to anyone and sometimes you need [...]
Jul
ClickUp Day São Paulo 2025: A New Era in Productivity
On April 3, 2025, TaskUP, in partnership with ClickUp, held [...]
May
ClickUp 3.56: Revolution with AI
ClickUp 3.56: This week, ClickUp brings a real revolution with new Intelligence features [...]
May
ClickUp Dashboards for Sales: Turn Your Data into Results
In the competitive environment of sales, understanding your team's performance is key to identifying [...]
Oct
5 Habits That Will Boost Your Productivity Within ClickUp
Increase your productivity on ClickUp with these 5 essential habits. Learn how to use templates, automations, [...]
Jan
What are agile values? (Definitive Guide)
Want to learn about agile values? The agile approach is one of the most efficient ways of creating products. [...]
Jun